Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Niagara is first win of the tourney

Congrats to the Purple Eagles of Niagara...in their 12th consecutive victory, they held off Florida A & M to make it to the tourney. I know nothing about them, but my friend's dad (Dr. LaBarber) was an alum, and he used to take us to Vesuvio's Pizza in Santa Clara in his Buick that had a Niagara sticker in the window. Oh, and Calvin Murphy is their greatest alum (as far as hoops go). As a bracketologist, I should know more - they are 23-11 for the season, and they're going up against powerhouse Kansas, so no on really cares. But it is worth noting that the boys from the house of Phog have been upset early in the previous two tournaments. It's also worth noting that they hired Dayton's band to play for them in last night's game. There's no other sporting event where somthing like that could happen. Enjoy it kids, because some day Comcast will own the tourney and they'll ruin it with half-time shows.

Death of the Bracketmaster

My brother Steve sent this article to me from Slate...it's about a guy who used to run his pools the way we run the Lou. He laments the loss of the old way of doing things, which I would too if I sold out and started letting Yahoo have all the fun. People ask me why I don't use one of the online tools to run this thing...and I always tell them that I actually enjoy correcting the pools. It's fun to see what you all picked, and it gives me a chuckle sometimes (as in, "What a LOSER! No way does Maryland go to the final game..hahahaha!!!), and sometimes it gives me some incredible insight into one's humanity (as in, "Wow, Dan the beer-drinking slob I went to college with is incredibly astute. He picked Maryland to go to the final game. AND, he knows the Latin name for Terrapin...sheesh"). I really do enjoy this stuff and wouldn't have it any other way.

The Death of the BracketmasterA fond farewell to the ink-stained wretch who used to run your NCAA pool.
By Dan KoisPosted
Monday, March 12, 2007, at 3:52 PM ET

Once upon a time, you needed to plan ahead to watch the start of the NCAA Tournament. A fake coughing fit on Wednesday afternoon, an artificially raspy voice on Thursday morning, and by Thursday afternoon you'd be on your couch watching CBS. These days, every opening-round game is available via streaming video, and the tournament is the biggest sporting event in the country—a three-week mega-event that mashes up pride for our alma maters, our love of underdogs, and a collective affinity for low-stakes gambling.

As the tourney's scale has grown, so have the office pools. A few short years ago, America's cubicles were filled with the sounds of pencils scratching away on paper brackets. Now, online tournament tools are required to handle the massive amounts of entries. With the death of the paper bracket has come the death of a beloved office character, the guy responsible for more than his fair share of America's lost March productivity: the Bracketmaster.

You know the Bracketmaster. He's the harried, Sharpie-stained guy who organized your office pool, collected the brackets, and handed out the prize money. He gave his heart, his soul, and four to six hours of each day to college basketball. And now he's obsolete.

For seven years, I was the Bracketmaster. My NCAA pool grew from a friendly gathering of 15 co-workers and pals to an unmanageable 141 entrants from 18 states and three countries. By the end, running the pool had become a second job. Part of the time-suck came from dealing with all those $5 bills, personal checks, and PayPal notices. A lot of the problem was that I felt obligated to write entertaining e-mail updates, which gradually grew from short lists of high scorers to long, discursive accounts of the day's games and rationalizations of my annual pick of the University of North Carolina. (Foolishly loyal to the end, I even picked the Tar Heels in 2002, the year they didn't make the tournament.)

But what truly ate up my time were the brackets. Oh, God, the brackets. My life became an endless torrent of paper. The brackets carpeted the floor, festooned the couch, covered the computer keyboard. We received them by e-mail as PDFs, Word documents, or Excel spreadsheets. We received brackets via fax, including a handwritten one on U.S. Senate letterhead with a note claiming that "No taxpayer dollars were wasted on the creation of this bracket." And we got brackets in the mail, one of which arrived in an envelope reading: "ATTENTION FEDERAL POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE: ILLEGAL GAMBLING DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED."

For three weeks, my wife and I wielded red Sharpies, circling winners and X-ing out losers. We enjoyed the godlike power, taking particular joy when an entrant's championship pick lost in the early rounds. There was no finer feeling than crossing that name out all the way down the bracket lines, malevolent Fate snipping the thread of any possible future that might have contained Gonzaga—really, what were they thinking?—as NCAA champion.

For a god, I was surprisingly fallible, making tiny but crucial mathematical errors. Even when I got all the brackets right, entrants misremembered their own picks and sent me angry e-mails about their score. Sure, I was kingpin of an international gambling ring, but where was the glamour? When you came right down to it, I was just pushing paper around—a fifth-grade math teacher, marking pop quizzes for a class full of grade grubbers.

So, after seven years of hard labor, I quit. We had a daughter to take care of, which meant I didn't really have time for one job, much less two. Naturally, the first year I didn't run a pool, North Carolina won it all.

Tourney pools have changed since I gave mine up. Web sites like ESPN.com have developed ever more powerful Web apps to manage the Madness. With these tools, it's a snap to organize a group of co-workers or a group of friends around the world, or simply test your mettle against millions of other hoops fans. And since computers are a bit better at math than humans, brackets can now be graded accurately in an instant rather than graded inaccurately over the course of two days. With NCAA pools now pretty much paperless, the Bracketmaster is out of a job. (Rather, he no longer has his second job, which, on the bright side, may allow him to keep his first job.)

A confession: For the first time in several years, I'm running a pool this season—using an online bracket. All I have to do is set up a group on ESPN.com, click through my own bracket, and send out an invitation to my friends; the Worldwide Leader does the rest. But I'll miss the tactile sensation of working my way through the bracket, circling teams, making a last-second choice to scribble out that No. 4 seed in favor of the 13. I'll miss the pleasure of putting pen to paper and ruthlessly culling 65 teams down to one (North Carolina, obviously). There are certain tasks that are simply more satisfying when done the old-fashioned way; solving a crossword puzzle, for example, will never feel right on a computer screen. Filling out a bracket feels the same. Pointing and clicking VCU over Duke does not offer the rich emotional rewards of slowly, deliciously putting pencil to paper and sending Coach K to his doom.

As a Bracketmaster and a stretched-thin dad, I won't miss those paper brackets, which have now gone the way of the computer punch card. But as a college basketball fan, I'll miss the intense, laserlike focus on college basketball I developed while handling all those printouts. I'll miss immersing myself in the tournament and becoming a bracket savant—the guy who knows every first-round matchup by heart, the guy with the data at his fingertips. But I won't miss the paper cuts.

Dan Kois has worked as a film executive and a literary agent. He lives in New York City.

Hey smart guy...

Here's another set of facts, and actually potentially really useful. This is also from the Daily Spec site, and these were compiled by hedge fund trader Alston Mabry:

If the tournament were a coin-tossing exercises, there would indeed be 2^63 = nine quadrillion outcomes. But can we improve those odds?

Looking at the NCAA Tournament results for 2005 and 2006, 86 of 126 games were won by the higher-seeded team, a 68.3% win rate for the NCAA seeding committee. If the seeding were random, one would expect a win rate of 50% with a 4-5% standard deviation, so the committee's results are inconsistent with randomness.

If you go further and rank the games by the difference in seeding (low seed minus high seed, so that a one seed playing a 16 seed would be a 15-spread game), and then look at the quartiles, you see that the committee is even more successful. The first column is the average difference in seeding between the teams in the quartile, and the second column is the rate at which higher-seeded teams won in that quartile:

seed diff / win rate
12.29 87%
7.79 75%
4.25 69%
1.27 42%

Nine quintillion...put THAT in your pipe and smoke it!

From the Victor Neiderhoffer's Daily Speculations site:

The odds of one person's filling out a perfect bracket for the NCAA basketball tournament, i.e., the odds of picking every single game winner correctly is nine quintillion to one.
Another way to view this is that if every person on the planet were to randomly fill out one million sheets the chances would be one in 1000 that a perfect sheet would be found.
The odds of picking the five numbers in the Powerball lottery are one in 3,563,609 but to pick all five numbers and the powerball are one in 146,107,962.

Wasting "The Man's" time...

From the NY Times:

Want to Get Some Work Done? Wait Till April
By PHYLLIS KORKKI
Published: March 11, 2007

Warning to employers: this might not be the best time to assign a big, complicated project. That’s becauseMarch is the No. 1 month for distracted workers. Yes, it that’s time of year when loyalty to the alma mater, the drama of the Cinderella story and the beauty of the bracket system converge into March Madness, or the N.C.A.A. men’s college basketball tournament, which starts later this week. Oh, and abet in the office pool may play a part, too.

These days, employees are grateful that Internet video has made it easier to pretend to work, although allthe whoops, yelps and curses issuing from theircubicles mean that no one is fooled.

Lost productivity from March Madness could costcompanies more than $1.2 billion, the consulting firmChallenger, Gray & Christmas estimates. But accordingto a survey, most companies do not view the temporary obsession as a problem. Some even see it as a rewardfor a job well done — for most of the year, anyway.